![]() ![]() Many areas on the map have not been conclusively identified with real or mythical places. Scholarly debate exists over the specific sources used in the map's creation and the number of source maps. There are conflicting interpretations of the map. Historian Karen Pinto has described the combination of legendary creatures from the edge of the known world with positive portrayals as challenging the medieval Islamic idea of an "inhabited quarter" of the world surrounded by an impassable Encircling Ocean. The map was unusual in the Islamic cartographic tradition for incorporating many non-Muslim sources. The map is visually distinct from European portolan charts, populated by Islamic miniatures. The southern coast of the Atlantic Ocean is widely accepted to be a version of Terra Australis. Scholars attribute the peculiar arrangement of the Caribbean to a now-lost map from Columbus that depicted Cuba as part of the Asian mainland and Hispaniola according to Marco Polo's description of Japan. The depiction of South America is detailed and accurate for its time. It contains extensive notes primarily in Ottoman Turkish. The map is a portolan chart with compass roses and a windrose network for navigation, rather than lines of longitude and latitude. When rediscovered in 1929, the remaining fragment garnered international attention as it includes a partial copy of an otherwise lost map by Christopher Columbus. Approximately one third of the map survives, housed in the Topkapı Palace in Istanbul. The Piri Reis map is a world map compiled in 1513 by the Ottoman admiral and cartographer Piri Reis. 1513 Ottoman nautical chart Surviving fragment of the Piri Reis map ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |